DOGE Seeks Access to Americans’ Private Data

DOGE Seeks Access to Americans’ Private Data \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ The Trump administration is urging the Supreme Court to allow Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) access to sensitive Social Security records, which contain personal data on nearly all Americans. A Maryland judge previously blocked access under federal privacy laws, citing concerns over abuse. The emergency appeal marks DOGE’s first major legal challenge before the high court.

Quick Looks

• Request: Trump administration seeks Supreme Court approval for data access
• Agency Involved: Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)
• Blocked Access: Maryland judge restricted DOGE over privacy violations
• Data Type: Includes medical, financial, school, and disability records
• Legal Opposition: Filed by Democracy Forward on behalf of retirees, unions
• Security Risk: Experts warn of dangerous precedent for federal surveillance
• Court Response: SCOTUS asked challengers for response by May 12
• Musk’s Position: Sees Social Security as fraud-ridden “Ponzi scheme”
• Government Argument: Claims order interferes with executive authority
• Judicial Trend: DOGE faces over 25 lawsuits across multiple federal courts

Deep Look

In a move likely to reignite fierce debates over privacy and government overreach, the Trump administration on Friday filed an emergency request to the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to lift a lower court block that currently prevents Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing highly sensitive Social Security data.

The appeal comes just weeks after U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland issued an injunction that limited DOGE’s access to the massive trove of federal records. These databases, operated by the Social Security Administration, contain medical histories, bank account data, salary information, school records, and mental health files for millions of Americans—particularly those receiving disability assistance.

What the Trump Administration Wants

The Solicitor General, John Sauer, filed the petition late Friday, insisting the court must intervene to allow DOGE to perform its anti-waste mission unimpeded.

“Left undisturbed, this preliminary injunction will only invite further judicial incursions into internal agency decision-making,” Sauer wrote.

The administration contends that the restrictions imposed by the lower court interfere with the president’s constitutional authority to oversee the executive branch and stifle DOGE’s efforts to root out what it believes is rampant fraud and mismanagement in Social Security.

Musk’s Mission: Efficiency or Overreach?

DOGE, created under Trump’s second-term executive order and led initially by Elon Musk, is tasked with streamlining federal operations. While Musk is expected to soon step back from day-to-day oversight, his influence remains embedded in the department’s controversial approach.

Musk has publicly labeled Social Security a “Ponzi scheme” and framed the program as a prime example of government waste ripe for restructuring. His critics argue that DOGE has become a hyper-aggressive instrument of deregulation, enabling widespread layoffs and agency closures across Washington.

Legal and Public Opposition Builds

The emergency appeal follows a ruling that DOGE’s request for unrestricted access amounted to a “fishing expedition” based on speculative claims, not concrete evidence of wrongdoing. Judge Hollander’s ruling still permits DOGE to work with anonymized data, but the administration claims this significantly undercuts the program’s efficiency.

Opposition groups—led by Democracy Forward, a legal nonprofit representing unions and retirees—have challenged DOGE’s practices in court. In total, more than 25 lawsuits have been filed challenging the agency’s methods and mandates, alleging privacy violations and abuse of executive power.

“If DOGE gets a hold of this information, it opens the floodgates on a host of potential harms,” said Elizabeth Laird, director at the Center for Democracy and Technology.

Privacy advocates warn that allowing access to such broad personal data sets a dangerous precedent for federal agencies. Critics fear a future in which private health, financial, and educational data can be examined by politically appointed analysts under the guise of efficiency.

A Broader Legal Battlefield

The DOGE case is just one of hundreds of lawsuits targeting Trump’s second-term conservative agenda, which has emphasized deregulation, deep federal spending cuts, and a fundamental reshaping of public institutions.

Cases involving immigration policy, civil service layoffs, and environmental rollbacks are already working their way through the courts. In many instances, the Supreme Court has ruled narrowly in the administration’s favor, especially on procedural grounds, while rebuffing broader claims of unchecked executive authority.

This case may test how far the Court is willing to let an executive agency go when it comes to accessing sensitive personal data.

What Comes Next

The Supreme Court has asked the plaintiffs to respond to the administration’s emergency application by May 12, after which it could decide whether to intervene or allow the lower court ruling to stand during ongoing litigation.

Until then, DOGE’s access to Social Security records remains restricted—a significant roadblock to one of the administration’s most ambitious and controversial initiatives.

Whether this is seen as a vital reform to eliminate government waste or a dangerous expansion of surveillance powers may ultimately rest with the nine justices of the Supreme Court.

More on US News

DOGE Seeks Access DOGE Seeks Access