House Approves Cuts to NPR, PBS and Foreign Aid/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ The House narrowly passed a $9.4 billion rescission package targeting NPR, PBS, and foreign aid. Republicans argue the cuts align with taxpayer priorities; Democrats warn of humanitarian consequences. The vote tests Trump’s “America First” spending agenda and sets the stage for Senate action.
Trump Pushes House Cuts: Quick Looks
- Narrow victory: House approves rescissions, 214–212, snatching funds from CPB and global programs.
- Public media targeted: $1.1 billion slated from Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
- Humanitarian fallout: Globally, access to clean water, healthcare, and shelters is at risk.
- Strategic move: Republicans use rescission to sidestep Senate filibuster and test GOP spending unity.
House Approves Cuts to NPR, PBS and Foreign Aid
Deep Look
What Happened
The House approved a $9.4 billion rescission package requesting Trump’s signature to claw back previously appropriated funds—a seldom-used budget tool. At 214–212, it targets public broadcasting and dozens of foreign programs .
Public Broadcasting Under Fire
Highlights include nearly $1.1 billion pulled from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), jeopardizing NPR, PBS, and over 1,500 local stations—especially in rural areas . Democrats argue this move endangers critical news access and civic engagement. CPB CEO Patricia Harrison warned of “disruption for millions of Americans who rely on it” .
Global Health and Humanitarian Cuts
The package rescinds $900 million from health and humanitarian programs, including $500 million targeting infectious diseases, maternal-child health, and $400 million from HIV response (PEPFAR) . Additionally, $800 million is cut from global emergency shelter, water, sanitation, and refugee support .
Democrats argue the cuts will strip access to clean water for 3.6 million people and severely impact education, prompting Oxfam America’s Abby Maxman to highlight increased hunger and health risks .
Party Lines and Political Strategy
Republicans argue that rescinding funds counter “wasteful” spending and support Trump’s “America First” fiscal discipline. Leader Mike Johnson said taxpayer dollars will be better prioritized, and GOP Chair Lisa McClain emphasized domestic focus .
Democrats, led by Hakeem Jeffries, labeled the move “cruel,” warning of global instability and humanitarian fallout. Steve Cohen suggested the cuts benefit Russia and China by undermining U.S. influence abroad .
Shifting Votes and Senate Ahead
The measure passed thanks to a pair of Republican switch votes—Don Bacon and Nick LaLota—who received assurances that certain programs (PBS funding and PEPFAR) will be protected .
The Senate now has until mid-July to act under a simplified majority process, bypassing the filibuster. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated debate might wait until broader tax and immigration bills are finalized .
Implications for Trump’s Agenda
For Trump, this vote is a test of fiscal leadership and fulfillment of his 2024 “America First” commitment. Republicans see this as demonstrating genuine budget discipline ahead of the midterms. By reclaiming funds via rescission, not new legislation, the White House avoids Senate roadblocks and exceeds traditional appropriations limits .
You must Register or Login to post a comment.