American Eagle Defends Sydney Sweeney Ad Amid Controversy/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ American Eagle Outfitters defended its Sydney Sweeney campaign following backlash over its “great jeans” tagline. Critics accused the ad of reinforcing Western beauty ideals and using insensitive wordplay. The brand insists the focus was solely on denim, not genetics or appearance.
Brand Statement and Controversy – Quick Looks
- American Eagle says its campaign with Sweeney was “always about the jeans.”
- Backlash arose over perceived messaging tied to beauty standards and eugenics.
- A viral teaser used “genes” instead of “jeans,” sparking further controversy.
- The company made its first public statement via Instagram.
- Marketing chief said the campaign aimed to be “provocative” and push boundaries.
- Critics accuse the ad of unintentionally referencing racial bias and selective traits.
- Some experts say controversy can drive marketing success.
- Sydney Sweeney is known for roles in Euphoria and White Lotus.
- American Eagle’s statement reaffirmed inclusivity and body confidence.
- The campaign remains live despite growing debate online.
American Eagle Defends Sydney Sweeney Ad Amid Controversy
Deep Look
NEW YORK — Facing growing criticism over its latest denim campaign featuring actress Sydney Sweeney, teen retailer American Eagle Outfitters has clarified its intentions: the ad was “always about the jeans.” The brand’s statement follows a wave of backlash from consumers and commentators who felt the campaign played into controversial racial and beauty narratives.
The campaign, titled “Sydney Sweeney has great jeans,” launched last week with widespread exposure across digital and social media. While its tagline seemed playful and fashion-focused, critics honed in on a companion video clip that sparked a different kind of dialogue.
In that teaser—shared on Facebook and other platforms but not part of the main campaign—Sweeney states: “Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color. My jeans are blue.”
The pun—switching “jeans” for “genes”—led some to interpret the campaign as a veiled celebration of Sweeney’s blonde hair, blue eyes, and Eurocentric features. A number of social media users and critics accused the brand of reinforcing Western beauty standards and, in the most extreme interpretations, of echoing eugenicist themes through its wordplay.
Brand Clarifies Intent
On Friday, American Eagle responded directly to the controversy with an Instagram post emphasizing the focus on fashion, not genetics.
“This campaign is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story,” the post reads. “We’ll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone.”
It was the first formal acknowledgment of the controversy from the company, even as the conversation continued to swirl online.
Was the Controversy the Goal?
Prior to the campaign’s rollout, American Eagle’s Chief Marketing Officer told industry outlets that the brand aimed to use “clever, even provocative language” and acknowledged that the campaign was intended to “push buttons.” Whether the team foresaw the specific backlash tied to the word “genes” remains unclear.
While the central ad was focused on denim fashion, the brand’s choice to promote an off-script teaser with loaded phrasing drew more heat than praise. Though it wasn’t part of the official campaign, critics believe its release contributed to public confusion and undermined the campaign’s intentions.
Sydney Sweeney, 27, has seen her public profile grow through roles in acclaimed series like HBO’s Euphoria and White Lotus. With her casting, American Eagle appeared to be capitalizing on her rising celebrity while showcasing its fall denim line.
But many observers argue that representation in fashion advertising still matters, and that featuring a slim, fair-skinned actress in a campaign centered on inherited traits sends a narrow message—intentional or not.
“If you’re talking about ‘great genes’ while highlighting someone who fits traditional Eurocentric beauty ideals, it doesn’t land as just a fun pun,” said Dr. Mia Franklin, a sociologist and media critic. “It sends signals about who fashion is really for.”
A Marketing Win Despite the Noise?
Despite the criticism, some branding experts say the campaign achieved what modern marketers crave most: buzz. Whether positive or negative, discussion around a campaign can increase its visibility and engagement.
“If you try to follow all the rules, you’ll make lots of people happy, but you’ll fail,” said Allen Adamson, co-founder of branding agency Metaforce. “The rocket won’t take off.”
Adamson and others argue that even controversial ad campaigns can succeed if they drive attention and brand recall, particularly among younger consumers accustomed to edgier digital content.
Still, American Eagle’s campaign also serves as a case study in the risks of wordplay, especially when subtle cultural messages are at stake. With increasing consumer awareness around representation, inclusion, and sensitivity, brands must walk a careful line between being clever and being careless.
As of now, the campaign remains active, and the company has made no announcement about pulling the teaser video.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.