A Week Into Israel–Iran War, Diplomacy Begins/ newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ A week into the Israel‑Iran war, both countries launched new strikes while diplomatic efforts got underway. President Trump weighs direct U.S. military involvement as Iran’s foreign minister heads for Geneva. European mediators propose reviving nuclear deal mechanisms amid ongoing airstrikes and missile exchanges.

Israel‑Iran Conflict & Diplomacy + Quick Looks
- Day seven into war brings fresh airstrikes and missile exchanges
- Trump mulls U.S. action at Iran’s Fordo nuclear site; a decision due in two weeks
- Iran’s FM Araghchi travels to Geneva; refuses talks until Israel halts strikes
- Europe’s Macron announces a technical‑diplomatic offer to Iran in Geneva
- Israel targets missile factories, SPND research facilities, and launchers
- Iranian missile attacks strike residential areas and hospitals in Israel, injuring dozens


A Week Into Israel–Iran War, Diplomacy Begins
Deep Look
Escalation — Weeklong Air Strikes:
A day into the second week of escalating hostilities, Israel and Iran launched renewed attacks on one another. Israel’s military deployed more than 60 warplanes early Friday, targeting key Iranian industrial and military infrastructure. The strikes focused on missile production facilities and the headquarters of the Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research (SPND)—an agency the U.S. has previously linked to Tehran’s nuclear weapons research.
Additional air raids concentrated on western Iranian military installations: missile storage and launch areas near Kermanshah, Tabriz, and the Rasht industrial zones along the Caspian Sea. Iran’s anti-aircraft defenses reportedly responded with heavy fire, though the full extent of damage remains unconfirmed due to Iran’s limited internet connectivity.
On the ground in Israel, Magen David Adom, the country’s emergency medical service, reported Iranian missiles striking a residential building in southern Israel, damaging a six-story block. At least five people were treated for minor injuries—primarily from smoke inhalation, bruising, and anxiety. This latest attack came just one day after over 80 individuals—patients and staff—were wounded at Soroka Medical Center in Beer Sheba. A day earlier, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz issued stark warnings that Iran’s Supreme Leader “cannot continue to exist.”
U.S. Involvement Decision Looms—Trump’s Two-Week Timeline:
President Trump faces mounting pressure to intervene. Central to his dilemma is the deeply buried Fordo uranium enrichment facility, situated under a mountain ridge outside Tehran. The site is considered unreachable without U.S. bunker-buster bombs, which Israel lacks.
Trump stated he would decide whether to sanction U.S. involvement—with a potential attack on Fordo—“within two weeks.” The debate centers on whether military strikes would achieve deterrence or risk broadening the war.
Diplomatic Momentum in Geneva:
Diplomatic activity intensified as Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s foreign minister, traveled toward Geneva for talks set to include the UK, France, Germany, and the EU. Before departure, he reiterated on Iranian state TV that Iran would “not seek negotiations” while Israel continues its air assault. He emphasized that any U.S. involvement would signal collusion with Israel, pointing to language from President Trump as proof.
Araghchi stressed discussions would be limited to Iran’s nuclear program, not its missile capabilities, in even that context. These remarks framed the hard diplomatic line Tehran has taken: no ceasefire, no talks, until attacks cease.
European Response—Macron’s Technical Proposal:
On the sidelines of the Paris Air Show, President Emmanuel Macron announced that European diplomats would deliver a “comprehensive, diplomatic and technical offer of negotiation” aimed at resolving the nuclear stalemate in tandem with defusing conflict. Macron emphasized a limited military campaign by Israel would not suffice:
“No one can seriously believe that this threat can be met with (Israel’s) current operations alone…
We need to regain control on (Iran’s nuclear) program through technical expertise and negotiation.”
This echoes ambitions to revive elements of the 2015 nuclear accord, before the U.S. withdrew in 2018 and Iran resumed uranium enrichment beyond agreed limits.
5. Historical Nuclear Deal Context:
Iran’s 2015 deal with world powers—including the U.S., UK, France, Germany, China, and Russia—restrained its nuclear capabilities in return for sanctions relief. After the U.S. exit, Iran decreased cooperation with inspectors and ramped enrichment to 60%—just steps away from weapons-grade levels.
The current diplomatic blueprint aims to harness the technical architecture of the old deal to resume oversight and limit enrichment, without needing full reentry or sanctions relief.
Casualties, Retaliation, and Air Defense:
- Iran Casualties: Iranian rights group Human Rights Activists reported at least 657 deaths so far in Iran—263 civilians included—and about 2,000 wounded.
- Israel Casualties: More modest but still concerning—24 killed and several hundred injured from missile and drone strikes on Israeli cities. Most threats have been intercepted by Israel’s robust, multi-tiered air defense systems.
Broader Military Context:
- Israel continues a strategic campaign against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, hitting Natanz, centrifuge workshops around Tehran, and Isfahan.
- Israeli strikes reportedly destroyed up to two-thirds of Iran’s ballistic missile launchers. Still, Tehran has thousands of launchers—so the conflict remains far from a technical victory in Israel’s favor.
Outlook & Potential Paths Forward:
- U.S. Military Positioning: American bases and forces in the Middle East remain on heightened alert. Plans to defend U.S. personnel are underway regardless of Trump’s final decision.
- Iran’s Strategic Posture: Iran remains defiant, prepared to retaliate if the U.S. intervenes or the conflict spills into its territory. Tehran appears ready to use unmanned drones, ballistic missiles, and regional proxies to respond asymmetrically.
- Diplomatic Window: European effort in Geneva could shift momentum toward renewed dialogue. However, Iran’s refusal to negotiate under fire—combined with ongoing strikes—may hinder progress without ceasefire assurance.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.