China Slams Trump Ban on Harvard’s International Students/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ China denounced the Trump administration’s ban on Harvard’s international students, warning it damages U.S. credibility. India is monitoring the situation as thousands of students face uncertainty.
China Condemns Trump’s Harvard Ban – Quick Looks
- Official Response: China calls the visa ban harmful to U.S. credibility
- Harvard Impact: 6,703 international students affected, including 1,203 from China and 788 from India
- Global Concern: Ban triggers anxiety among foreign students and parents
- Beijing’s Statement: U.S. politicizing education, says Chinese Foreign Ministry
- Litigation Ongoing: Harvard has sued the Trump administration to block the policy
- India’s Position: Officials are assessing impact; no official condemnation yet
- Social Media Reaction: Heated debates and jokes spread across Chinese platforms
- Alternative Offers: Hong Kong universities extend invitations to affected students
- Advisory Firms Respond: Counselors urge students to stay calm amid legal action
- Broader Context: Ban deepens U.S.-China education tensions, recalls prior student visa rejections
Deep Look: China Blasts Trump Administration’s Ban on Harvard’s International Students
BANGKOK — China sharply criticized the Trump administration’s decision to bar Harvard University from enrolling foreign students, calling the move damaging to America’s global image as students and families around the world face growing uncertainty.
Speaking Friday, China’s Foreign Ministry condemned the visa ban, which affects thousands of students and sparked immediate backlash across global education circles.
“This politicization of educational cooperation will only damage the U.S.’s own international reputation,” said ministry spokesperson Mao Ning in a daily press briefing in Beijing.
The Trump administration announced Thursday it would revoke Harvard’s ability to sponsor student visas, citing national security concerns and alleged anti-American activities on campus — claims the university has strongly denied and is now challenging in federal court.
Harvard has 6,703 international students, including 1,203 from China and 788 from India, according to 2024 enrollment data. The decision jeopardizes the academic futures of those already enrolled, and thousands more planning to attend.
Online Backlash and Policy Warnings in China
Chinese state broadcaster CCTV questioned whether the U.S. could remain a leading destination for international education, warning that policy unpredictability would push students to consider other options like the U.K. and Canada.
“When policy uncertainty becomes the norm, international students will inevitably weigh other paths,” the broadcaster said in a commentary.
Social media platforms in China lit up with concern and criticism. Some joked that Harvard should set up a satellite campus in Harbin, due to the similarity in the name’s Chinese pronunciation. But many voiced frustration and disappointment, pointing to past incidents where Chinese students were detained at U.S. airports or denied visas altogether.
China’s Foreign Ministry also reaffirmed its intent to protect its students abroad, though it provided no specific details about any measures in response to the U.S. move.
India Takes a Cautious Approach
Indian officials are taking a more reserved approach. Authorities are currently reviewing the impact of the ban on nearly 800 Indian students at Harvard, as well as those preparing to begin programs this fall.
While no official statement condemning the decision has been released, concern is mounting among families and education consultants in India.
Mumbai-based advisory firm ReachIvy reported a surge in calls from worried students and parents. Founder Vibha Kagzi, a Harvard Business School alum, urged calm and noted that legal challenges are already in motion.
“Harvard will surely fight back,” she said. “Universities value international talent and are actively working to protect student access.”
Kagzi reflected on her own experience studying in the U.S. in 2010, noting how different the environment was then, with policies that welcomed global scholars.
Alternatives and Global Academic Support
Universities in Hong Kong quickly stepped up to fill the gap. Both the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and City University announced they would welcome displaced students from Harvard, either explicitly or implicitly referencing the ban.
These offers underline the global implications of Trump’s education crackdown, with countries increasingly positioning themselves as alternative hubs for higher education.
Longstanding Tensions
This latest flashpoint follows a series of incidents during Trump’s first term in which Chinese students were subjected to stricter visa policies and increased scrutiny upon arrival in the U.S.
Last year, Beijing formally protested the interrogation and deportation of multiple Chinese students at U.S. entry points. Meanwhile, Chinese state media has consistently amplified reports of crime and racial tensions in the U.S., further discouraging students from studying abroad there.
With diplomatic relations already tense over trade, military posturing, and tech security, the student visa ban may further inflame U.S.-China friction — and place thousands of academic careers in limbo.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.