Hegseth Fires DIA Chief Gen. Jeffrey Kruse After Trump Iran Dispute/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has dismissed Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse, head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, after his agency’s assessment of U.S. strikes on Iran contradicted Trump’s claims. Other senior Navy officials were also removed in a wave of military leadership shakeups. Democrats warn the moves politicize intelligence and chill dissent.
Pentagon Shakeup After Iran Strikes: Quick Looks
- Key Firing: Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse, Defense Intelligence Agency chief
- Trigger: DIA’s assessment that Iran’s nuclear program setback was minor
- Trump’s Claim: Declared program “obliterated,” clashing with intelligence reports
- Other Firings: Vice Adm. Nancy Lacore and Rear Adm. Milton Sands
- Security Clearances: More national security officials stripped this week
- Democratic Response: Warned of “loyalty test” replacing independent analysis
- Past Pattern: Trump has repeatedly removed officials after unwelcome reports
- Military Impact: Broader shake-ups, including early retirements and legal firings
- DEI Purge: Belief some dismissals tied to opposition to diversity programs
- Reported First: Washington Post broke details of the firings
Deep Look: Pentagon General Fired After Trump Rejects Iran Intel
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration’s clash with its own intelligence agencies deepened Friday as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth dismissed Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse, the head of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The move followed weeks of friction over the agency’s assessment of damage from U.S. airstrikes against Iran, which contradicted President Trump’s declarations of a decisive military victory.
Iran Strikes and Disputed Intelligence
In June, U.S. forces launched strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities in an operation hailed by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a crippling blow. Trump declared the Iranian nuclear program “completely obliterated.”
But preliminary DIA findings leaked to the media painted a different picture: the strikes had set back Iran’s program by only a few months. The contrast enraged Trump, who has long viewed intelligence reporting with suspicion. He repeatedly derided the analysis in public, framing it as another example of agencies undermining him.
Hegseth defended the strikes as “historically successful” but offered no new evidence that the facilities were permanently destroyed.
A Broader Purge of Military Leaders
Kruse was not the only casualty. Vice Adm. Nancy Lacore, chief of the Navy Reserve, and Rear Adm. Milton Sands, a decorated Navy SEAL who commanded Naval Special Warfare, were also removed from their posts.
Their firings followed other high-profile dismissals in recent months:
- Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
- Gen. Tim Haugh, former head of the National Security Agency
- Vice Adm. Shoshana Chatfield, NATO official
- Several top service branch lawyers and senior officers
No detailed explanations have been given, though analysts believe the administration is purging leaders linked to diversity and inclusion programs, which Trump has ordered federal agencies to dismantle.
Security Clearances Revoked
In addition to personnel changes, the White House and intelligence agencies have escalated their crackdown on dissent. This week, several current and former national security officials lost their security clearances. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence also announced deep staff and budget cuts.
The moves highlight Trump’s determination to enforce loyalty across government, even at the cost of sidelining experienced intelligence officials.
Democrats Raise Alarm
Democratic lawmakers quickly condemned the firings as political retaliation.
Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said:
“The firing of yet another senior national security official underscores the Trump administration’s dangerous habit of treating intelligence as a loyalty test rather than a safeguard for our country.”
Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, demanded transparency, saying:
“Otherwise, we can only assume that this is another politically motivated decision intended to create an atmosphere of fear.”
Lawmakers pointed to Trump’s history of removing officials whose data contradicted his narrative — including firing the official responsible for a disappointing jobs report, blocking climate change studies, and scrubbing gender identity data from federal sites.
A Pattern of Distrust
Trump’s hostility toward intelligence dates back to his first term, when he rejected the 2017 assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. Since then, he has repeatedly accused intelligence agencies of political bias and sought to declassify documents casting doubt on their findings.
The firing of Kruse, combined with other leadership changes, signals the administration’s growing willingness to punish agencies for conclusions that diverge from Trump’s messaging. Analysts warn that this could chill independent analysis across the defense and intelligence community.
Global and Domestic Implications
The controversy comes as the U.S. seeks to contain tensions with Iran and reassure allies of its military and intelligence credibility. The perception of politicized firings, some experts say, risks undermining trust both within the Pentagon and among international partners.
Meanwhile, critics argue the purge consolidates power around Trump and Hegseth while sidelining dissenting voices, setting a precedent where national security assessments are shaped by political convenience.
As one Democratic aide put it: “The intelligence community is being told: tell the president what he wants to hear, or lose your job.”
You must Register or Login to post a comment.