NewsTop StoryWorld

Hungary, Poland can have funds withheld EU court rules

Hungary

The ruling by European Union’s highest court was hotly anticipated by many who had accused both Hungary and Poland of democratic backsliding, as socialism tries to prevail, which would crumble the EU’s foundations. The EU’s executive Commission said it would await Wednesday’s ruling before committing on whether to withhold funds, but its president Ursula von der Leyen immediately welcomed the ruling. As reported by the AP:

When it comes to democratic principles, ‘the European Union must be able to defend those values, within the limits of its powers,’ the court said

BRUSSELS (AP) — The European Union‘s highest court ruled on Wednesday that the 27-nation bloc can suspend support payments to member states if they breach rule of law principles and dismissed a challenge by Hungary and Poland.

FILE – Judges preside over a hearing at the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg on Nov. 27, 2018. The European Union’s highest court ruled on Wednesday, Feb. 16, 2022 that the 27-nation bloc can link financial backing for member states to respect for rule of law and that a challenge by Hungary and Poland should be dismissed. (AP Photo/Sylvain Plazy, File)

The right-wing governments of both nations had argued that such action lacked a proper legal basis. Both nations, large recipients of EU funds, have come under increasing criticism over the past few years for veering away from the Western principles of the respect for democratic values in their nations.

“The Court dismisses the actions brought by Hungary and Poland in their entirety,” the European Court of Justice said in a statement.

The ruling was hotly anticipated by many who had accused the two nations of democratic backsliding and had seen the linkage measure as the EU’s most potent weapon to prevent a democratic legitimacy rift deepening within the bloc.

When it comes to democratic principles, “the European Union must be able to defend those values, within the limits of its powers,” the court said.

The EU’s executive Commission said it would await Wednesday’s ruling before committing on whether to withhold funds, but its president Ursula von der Leyen immediately welcomed the ruling.

“The Commission will defend the Union’s budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law. We will act with determination,” von der Leyen promised.

Hungary’s reaction was swift. Justice Minister Judit Varga slammed the ruling on her Facebook page, calling it a “political judgement” and proof that the EU was abusing its power.

“The ruling is another application of pressure against our country because we passed our child protection law during the summer,” Varga wrote, referring to contentious Hungarian legislation last year which forbids the depiction of homosexuality or gender change to minors in media content. But the EU’s passage of the rule of law mechanism pre-dates that Hungarian law, which many critics have decried as a violation of LGBTQ rights.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen delivers a speech during a plenary session at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, eastern France, Wednesday, Dec. 15, 2021. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen says that omicron is expected to be the dominant coronavirus variant in the 27-nation bloc by mid-January. (Julien Warnand, Pool Photo via AP)

Both Hungary and Poland have in the past reasoned that the court was overstepping its authority in approving a new mechanism that is not described in the EU’s own treaties. They said making such a link between finances and the legal decisions of independent member states amounted to blackmail from Brussels.

The court argued however that democratic backsliding had not only a political impact but also affected budgetary matters.

“The sound financial management of the Union budget and the financial interests of the Union may be seriously compromised by breaches of the principles of the rule of law committed in a member state,” it said.

Poland and Hungary have faced criticism in the EU for years over allegations that they have been eroding judicial and media independence, among other democratic principles. The EU had found itself unable to do much to alter the course of either nation, and therefore turned to linking money to their adherence to democratic behavior.

Respecting democratic rule of law principles is a beacon of the EU admission criteria and the court insisted that, once in, those principles should stick.

“The Court specifies, first, that compliance with those values cannot be reduced to an obligation which a candidate state must meet in order to accede to the European Union and which it may disregard after accession,” it said.

In Hungary, Prime Minister Viktor Orban has been pushing what he calls “illiberal democracy,” which his critics say amounts to stifling democracy. In Poland, the Law and Justice party overwhelmingly dominates government and has also increasingly faced criticism from other EU member nations. The rightwing government has broken the nation’s own laws in order in order to gain political control over courts and judges.

Hungary and Poland initially sought to block the budget because of the introduction of the new mechanism, but eventually agreed to the plan on condition that the European Court of Justice would review it.

By RAF CASERT

Reporter Justin Spike contributed from Budapest.

For more world news

Previous Article
Omicron shatters record in S. Korea as rapid tests go out
Next Article
Olympics Live: Norway duo wins gold in cross-country sprint

How useful was this article?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this article.

Latest News

Menu