Iran Rebuilds Military After Devastating Israeli Strikes \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ A 12‑day Israeli bombing campaign severely weakened Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and missile stockpiles, forcing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei into seclusion. Domestic pressures—economic collapse, endemic corruption, power outages—and rising calls for a nuclear bomb complicate Tehran’s path forward. Analysts foresee internal purges, military‑led governance, and potential nuclear acceleration or diplomatic negotiations.
Quick Looks
- Israel’s strikes decimated senior Guard and missile infrastructure.
- Khamenei’s isolation signals a leadership crisis and shake‑up.
- Security chiefs may be purged; military rebuild looms.
- Nuclear armament debate intensifies amid strategic vulnerabilities.
- Sanctions‑crippled economy and blackouts deepen domestic instability.
Deep Look
Iran’s 12-day conflict with Israel has left the country’s leadership reeling, its military infrastructure battered, and its strategic doctrine in crisis. The Israeli bombardment, supported by precision intelligence and U.S.-supplied bunker-buster munitions, inflicted severe damage on the Islamic Republic’s most powerful institutions — particularly the elite Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), its ballistic missile arsenal, and components of its nuclear program.
The most telling sign of Iran’s vulnerability came from within: Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the 86-year-old architect of the country’s theocratic rule, vanished from public view during most of the fighting. His brief appearances in two carefully produced videos served as reminders of continuity, but also as signals of just how rattled the regime had become. For many Iranians and observers abroad, this absence confirmed the depth of Israel’s reach and the systemic weaknesses now plaguing Tehran.
More than a military setback, the war exposed deep fissures in the governing structure of Iran’s Islamic Republic. The Revolutionary Guard’s command echelon was decimated by targeted strikes, which also neutralized key nuclear scientists. Intelligence experts believe the level of Israeli infiltration into Iran’s military hierarchy is more extensive than previously acknowledged. This has left the leadership facing a daunting challenge: root out internal disloyalty, rebuild the damaged command structure, and reassert control — all while contending with the specter of domestic unrest and an economy in freefall.
“The leadership has been dealt a heavy blow,” the Eurasia Group noted in a post-conflict analysis, emphasizing that the current ceasefire gives Tehran a limited opportunity to stabilize internally and reassess its broader strategic posture. That opportunity may prove fleeting.
Within the upper echelons of power, loyalty purges appear imminent. Hamidreza Azizi, a fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, observed that “there must be some sort of purge,” though the question remains: who within the fragile leadership circle has the credibility and power to conduct it effectively?
Despite these losses, Iran’s military retains experienced figures. One key survivor, Gen. Esmail Qaani, commander of the Quds Force — the IRGC’s foreign operations wing — was seen at a pro-government demonstration in Tehran, signaling the regime’s intent to showcase unity and resilience. Yet the gap between appearance and operational strength is wide, and rebuilding the Guard’s capabilities will be a time-consuming and politically perilous endeavor.
Civilian governance is shifting as well. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has emerged as a powerful voice in the regime, issuing official communications about the ceasefire while other figures remained silent. His elevated profile suggests a potential recalibration of internal power dynamics, possibly pointing toward a more prominent civilian role in managing post-war recovery and foreign policy.
Strategically, Iran faces a major inflection point. For over two decades, Khamenei’s “Axis of Resistance” strategy allowed Tehran to extend its influence across Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen — ostensibly to deter conflict within its borders. Yet this war proved that such alliances are no longer effective shields. Israel’s strikes not only reached Iran’s homeland but also hit Iran-linked positions across the region with minimal resistance, suggesting the Axis may now be more liability than asset.
With those failures in mind, some voices within Iran’s establishment are reportedly pushing for the country to take the final step and develop a nuclear weapon. Although Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, it remains the only non-nuclear nation to enrich uranium up to 60% purity — a technical heartbeat away from weapons-grade.
Analysts such as Azizi believe that Khamenei may have crossed a psychological threshold. Long resistant to developing a bomb for fear of war, the supreme leader may now be entertaining that possibility as the only means of securing Iran’s sovereignty. But going nuclear would require a massive, covert rebuilding of damaged facilities and centrifuge networks — a process likely to attract renewed Israeli or American military action.
Conversely, diplomacy may still have life. U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff hinted at ongoing backchannel communications, describing the prospects for negotiation as “promising” and suggesting that both sides are cautiously exploring a longer-term peace framework. For Tehran, any return to talks would be driven by economic desperation. The rial has lost almost all its value since the 2015 nuclear deal, plunging from 32,000 to nearly 1 million per U.S. dollar. The country’s stock market and currency exchange shops were shuttered during the war, forestalling a potential collapse — but not for long.
At the grassroots level, the economic strain is palpable. Rolling blackouts have become a daily reality. Industrial output is lagging, and public anger simmers just below the surface. Previous crises — like the 2019 gasoline price protests and the 2022 demonstrations sparked by the death of Mahsa Amini — showed how quickly unrest can spiral. The latest conflict could serve as a pretext for the regime to intensify crackdowns under the guise of national security, especially as many Iranians, particularly women, continue to resist state-imposed restrictions like mandatory hijab laws.
Prominent voices such as Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi are sounding alarms. In a recent open letter, she warned that the Islamic Republic remains “a religious, authoritarian, and misogynistic regime — incapable of reform.” Yet she still called for an end to the war, arguing that “democracy and peace will not emerge from the dark and terrifying corridors of war and violence.”
Looming over all of this is the question of succession. Khamenei’s survival through the war may be temporary. His age and reported health problems prompt speculation about who will lead next — and what kind of Islamic Republic will emerge. Traditionalists favor another cleric, possibly his son Mojtaba Khamenei or a relative of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. But many analysts suggest the military may soon become the dominant force, shifting Iran from a clergy-led to a security-state model.
“This war has made that scenario more plausible,” Azizi noted. “The next government will be more military-security oriented.”
Iran’s path forward is far from certain. Rebuilding from within, reshaping its military doctrine, reassessing its nuclear future, and responding to an increasingly disillusioned public will define the Islamic Republic’s next chapter.
Iran Rebuilds Military Iran Rebuilds Military Iran Rebuilds Military
