JD Vance Opposes US Involvement in India-Pakistan War/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ Vice President JD Vance said the U.S. should not get involved in the escalating India-Pakistan conflict, calling it “none of our business.” His comments contrast with President Trump’s offer to mediate peace talks between the two nuclear-armed nations. Vance emphasized a non-interventionist stance while urging diplomatic efforts to prevent escalation.
JD Vance on India-Pakistan Conflict Quick Looks
- Vance says India-Pakistan war is “none of our business.”
- Trump offers to mediate tensions between nuclear neighbors.
- India struck targets in Pakistan after deadly Kashmir attack.
- Pakistan responded by downing fighter jets and drones.
- Vance: U.S. won’t control or intervene militarily.
- White House split? Fox seeks comment on Vance-Trump alignment.
- Conflict has killed dozens, threatens regional escalation.
- Vance urges diplomacy, downplays risk of nuclear war.
- Tensions echo past GOP rifts on foreign policy.
- Trump praises Vance, names him potential 2028 successor.
JD Vance Opposes US Involvement in India-Pakistan War
Deep Look
JD Vance Says U.S. Should Stay Out of India-Pakistan Conflict as Trump Offers Mediation
WASHINGTON — Vice President JD Vance pushed back on the idea of U.S. involvement in the escalating India-Pakistan conflict, stating bluntly that the decades-long regional feud is “fundamentally none of our business.”
Vance made the remarks during a Fox News interview Thursday night, drawing a clear line between President Trump’s offer to mediate and his own non-interventionist foreign policy stance.
“We’re not going to get involved in the middle of a war that has nothing to do with America’s ability to control it,” Vance told Martha McCallum.
His comments come as tensions between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan have surged after India launched airstrikes on nine targets in Pakistan’s territory, responding to a terrorist attack in Kashmir that killed 26 Indian tourists.
Trump vs. Vance: Diverging Tones
While Vance dismissed the idea of military involvement, President Trump struck a more conciliatory tone, offering to help mediate between the two countries.
“I know both [leaders] very well… If I can do anything to help, I will,” Trump told reporters, stressing the importance of ending the “tit-for-tat” escalation.
Trump emphasized that the U.S. maintains good diplomatic ties with both nations and expressed hope they would resolve the crisis without further bloodshed.
Vance Downplays Nuclear Risk, Emphasizes Diplomacy
Despite the volatility of the situation, Vance said he does not believe the conflict will escalate into a nuclear exchange. He insisted that the U.S. cannot dictate to either side and will continue pursuing diplomatic channels.
“We can’t tell the Indians to lay down their arms. We can’t tell the Pakistanis to lay down their arms,” Vance said.
India has accused a Pakistan-based terror group of orchestrating the Kashmir attack. In response, Pakistan has claimed that India’s retaliation killed civilians, called it an “act of war,” and said it downed five Indian fighter jets and multiple drones in return.
Regional Crisis Deepens
Since the airstrikes, India has activated reserve troops and launched additional drone incursions, heightening fears of a protracted conflict. Pakistan, meanwhile, has vowed to respond “with full force” to any additional violations of its sovereignty.
Footage from Muzaffarabad and Pulwama shows the aftermath of strikes, mass protests, and mounting civilian casualties. The Kashmir region, long contested by both nations, remains at the heart of the conflict.
“This isn’t America’s war to fight,” Vance reiterated, aligning with the America First foreign policy he has championed throughout his tenure.
Vance’s Foreign Policy Track Record
Vance has repeatedly opposed U.S. military involvement abroad, whether in the Middle East, Ukraine, or now in South Asia.
Earlier this year, he criticized the administration’s airstrikes against Houthi forces in Yemen, calling them inconsistent with Trump’s goals in Europe. He has also advocated for diplomatic engagement with Iran over military deterrence.
In a February meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Vance clashed with the wartime leader, telling him the U.S. could no longer endlessly bankroll Ukraine’s defense.
“You should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict,” Vance said, according to meeting participants.
GOP Rift on Foreign Policy Grows
Vance’s remarks reflect a growing divide within the Republican Party between interventionist hawks and Trump-aligned realists. Critics have labeled Vance’s approach “isolationist,” while supporters say it reflects a new conservative vision grounded in restraint.
Trump, meanwhile, appears to support Vance’s worldview — even if their rhetoric occasionally diverges. In a recent NBC interview, Trump named Vance as a top contender for the GOP’s future leadership.
“JD Vance is fantastic,” Trump said. “If someone’s the VP and they’re outstanding, of course they’d have an advantage.”
For now, it remains unclear whether the administration’s official policy will follow Trump’s mediating posture or Vance’s hands-off doctrine.
The White House has not clarified whether Vance’s comments reflect a shift in strategy or a personal viewpoint.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.