Kim Jong Un Blames ‘Criminal Negligence’ in Ship Mishap \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ North Korea has detained three senior shipyard officials following the failed launch of its second destroyer, which leader Kim Jong Un blamed on “criminal negligence.” The 5,000-ton warship tilted and was partially submerged during a ceremony in Chongjin. The incident marks a major embarrassment for Kim’s naval expansion ambitions.
Quick Looks
- 5,000-ton destroyer damaged during launch in Chongjin
- Incident occurred during ceremony attended by Kim Jong Un
- Kim calls it a “criminal act” of negligence and empiricism
- Ship tipped on its side; satellite imagery shows partial submersion
- Chief engineer and two shipyard officials detained
- Hull construction leader and admin manager also under investigation
- KCNA denies major damage, claims 10-day repair timeline
- Outside analysts believe damage is likely worse than admitted
- Vessel was to be North Korea’s most advanced warship
- Incident undermines Kim’s drive for naval modernization
Deep Look
The carefully stage-managed image of military precision and strength cultivated by North Korea suffered a rare blow this past week when the nation’s newest destroyer—the most advanced warship in its naval arsenal—tipped and partially sank during a launch ceremony attended by none other than Kim Jong Un himself.
What was intended to be a demonstration of the regime’s growing maritime power turned into a humiliating disaster, prompting swift internal punishment and raising fresh doubts about the state’s naval capabilities, engineering standards, and internal command structure.
Ceremony Turns Catastrophe
The failed launch unfolded on Wednesday at the Chongjin Shipyard, a key facility in North Korea’s northeast. State media later confirmed that the destroyer—a 5,000-ton-class warship intended to be the second in a new fleet—tilted and was damaged during its ceremonial debut due to a failure of the transport cradle at its stern.
Satellite imagery taken after the incident showed the vessel lying on its side in shallow water, partially submerged, and concealed beneath blue tarps. This unmistakable evidence contradicted Pyongyang’s attempts to minimize the damage. Despite official claims that only minor hull scratches and stern water intrusion occurred, outside defense analysts said the photos indicate structural damage that will likely take months—not days—to repair.
The North Korean regime, which almost never acknowledges operational failures, admitted the mishap through state media, likely due to the high visibility of the event and the presence of Kim himself at the site.
Detentions and Blame
In the wake of the incident, Kim Jong Un lashed out publicly, calling the failure “a criminal act caused by absolute carelessness, irresponsibility, and unscientific empiricism.” His comments signaled a harsh crackdown—and the regime quickly followed through.
Authorities detained three senior shipyard officials: the chief engineer, the head of the hull construction workshop, and the deputy administrative manager. In addition, shipyard manager Hong Kil Ho was summoned for investigation, according to the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA). These arrests and public shaming reflect the intolerance for failure under Kim’s leadership, especially in high-profile defense projects.
The Central Military Commission—North Korea’s top defense body—echoed Kim’s anger, stating that those responsible “can never evade their responsibility for the crime.”
These harsh consequences appear designed not just to assign blame but to restore internal discipline and deter future mishaps in other sectors of the military-industrial complex.
Why the Destroyer Matters
The damaged ship was the second known destroyer in North Korea’s fleet, following the launch of a similar 5,000-ton-class vessel just a month earlier. That first warship, celebrated with dramatic fanfare, was heralded by state media as North Korea’s most advanced war machine—capable of carrying a range of weapons, including nuclear missiles, and meant to bolster North Korea’s deterrence at sea.
Kim has made clear that expanding naval power is central to his military modernization strategy, especially amid rising regional tensions and what he calls “U.S.-led provocations” involving joint drills by South Korea, the United States, and Japan.
This second destroyer was meant to symbolize continuity and momentum in that strategic buildout. Its failure, therefore, strikes a significant blow—not only to North Korea’s military prestige but also to Kim’s personal image as a leader guiding his country through a transformative defense evolution.
A Rare Public Failure
North Korea’s admission of the failed launch is almost unprecedented in the state’s tightly controlled information ecosystem. The regime typically suppresses or distorts coverage of accidents, especially when they involve military hardware.
Analysts say the rare acknowledgment may have been unavoidable, given the satellite visibility of the site and the high-profile nature of the event. But the regime’s attempts to downplay the damage and claim that repairs will take just 10 days have drawn skepticism from international observers.
Some analysts believe the destroyer may have suffered structural frame compromise, particularly at the stern—damage that could require dry-docking, internal reinforcements, and potentially reconstruction of critical propulsion components.
Naval Modernization Under Scrutiny
The incident raises serious questions about North Korea’s industrial capabilities and quality control in military shipbuilding. While Pyongyang has succeeded in developing ballistic missile technology and conducted submarine-launched missile tests, large-scale naval engineering remains a complex and resource-intensive field.
North Korea’s economy remains under crippling international sanctions, limiting its access to critical parts, technologies, and raw materials. The failed destroyer launch may reflect shortcuts or improvisations taken during construction—choices that become dangerous in projects involving massive, multi-ton warships.
Broader Implications for Kim’s Regime
The failed launch also comes at a time of increased international visibility of North Korea’s military maneuvers. Pyongyang has ramped up both missile testing and diplomatic posturing, including strengthening ties with Russia and Iran, and warning against increased military cooperation between the U.S. and South Korea.
The destroyer incident could temporarily stall or redirect North Korea’s naval agenda. Alternatively, it could prompt accelerated military activities, as Kim seeks to regain face by showcasing alternative weapons systems or fast-tracking another launch.
Either way, it demonstrates that even in authoritarian regimes that thrive on control, engineering failure can’t always be masked, especially under the eyes of global satellite monitoring and intelligence networks.
Kim Jong Un Blames
You must Register or Login to post a comment.