Māori MPs Punished for Parliament Haka Demonstration \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ New Zealand’s Parliament has issued its longest-ever suspensions after three Māori Party lawmakers performed a haka in protest of a controversial bill. The demonstration reignited national debate over Indigenous rights and cultural expression. Lawmakers and advocates now question whether Māori traditions are fairly respected in legislative spaces.
Quick Looks
- Parliament suspended three Māori Party MPs for protest actions.
- Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke received a 7-day ban; two others, 21 days.
- Lawmakers performed a haka during a vote on a Treaty-related bill.
- The protest was seen as disruptive and intimidating by some MPs.
- This marks the harshest disciplinary action in NZ parliamentary history.
- Critics say Māori MPs were unfairly targeted for expressing culture.
- A parliamentary committee recommended the suspensions in April.
- The bill being opposed aimed to revise the Treaty of Waitangi’s standing.
- Opposition parties voted unanimously against the punishments.
- Debate over Māori cultural rights in Parliament continues to intensify.
Deep Look
In an unprecedented move, New Zealand lawmakers voted Thursday to suspend three members of the Māori Party for staging a protest haka inside Parliament—a response to a controversial bill that opponents said would undermine the Treaty of Waitangi, the country’s foundational agreement between Māori and the Crown.
The protest and ensuing political fallout have reignited longstanding tensions over how Indigenous culture and rights are treated within the formal institutions of New Zealand governance.
The Protest and the Punishment
The lawmakers at the center of the controversy—Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, and Rawiri Waititi—were disciplined for performing a haka, a ceremonial Māori dance and chant, in the debating chamber in November 2024. The haka was directed at government MPs during the vote on a widely criticized bill seeking to dilute the influence of the Treaty of Waitangi.
Maipi-Clarke was suspended for seven days, while Ngarewa-Packer and Waititi were each banned for 21 days—the longest suspensions ever handed down in New Zealand’s parliamentary history. The previous record was a three-day ban.
A parliamentary disciplinary committee determined that the issue wasn’t the haka itself, but that the MPs had crossed the floor of the chamber while performing it, which they argued was a breach of decorum and potentially threatening.
Committee Chair Judith Collins labeled the MPs’ actions “egregious, disruptive, and intimidating,” sparking a wave of backlash from critics who saw the punishment as disproportionate and culturally insensitive.
A Cultural Flashpoint
Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke, 22—the youngest member of Parliament and the first Māori woman elected in a general seat—rejected the notion that the protest was aggressive.
“I came into this house to give a voice to the voiceless. Is that the real issue here?” she asked during Thursday’s debate. “Are our voices too loud for this house?”
She noted that non-Māori MPs had crossed the debating chamber in previous confrontations without receiving similar punishments. The discrepancy, she and others argue, reveals deep-rooted bias in how Māori actions are perceived and disciplined in New Zealand’s political institutions.
The Bill Behind the Protest
At the heart of the protest was a bill seeking to rewrite how the Treaty of Waitangi is interpreted in modern law. The Treaty, signed in 1840 between Māori iwi (tribes) and representatives of the British Crown, is considered New Zealand’s founding document.
Over recent decades, legal and parliamentary actions have increasingly recognized the Treaty’s promises to Māori, including protections of land, language, and cultural identity. The proposed legislation aimed to curb that progress, prompting widespread concern over a constitutional backslide.
Tens of thousands of protesters marched to Parliament in November to oppose the bill. Although it was ultimately defeated, the haka protest occurred during the vote, as Maipi-Clarke initiated the chant from her seat and then walked toward the government benches.
She later apologized to the Speaker of Parliament for disrupting the proceedings but stood by the right to use haka as a form of protest.
The Disciplinary Divide
The disciplinary committee, typically bipartisan, was deeply split over the sanctions. Members from the governing coalition pushed for harsh penalties, with one party even requesting whether the Māori MPs could be jailed for their actions.
Opposition lawmakers, however, almost unanimously opposed the suspensions, arguing they were politically motivated and dangerously precedent-setting.
Parliament Speaker Gerry Brownlee attempted to broker a compromise through extended debate, hoping for a consensus. When that failed, the vote was forced through with the government majority pushing the bans into effect, while all opposition members voted against them.
Global Reaction and Domestic Reflection
The protest made international headlines, especially within Indigenous rights communities worldwide. Human rights organizations and Māori advocacy groups condemned the suspensions, calling them “excessive and culturally hostile.”
New Zealand prides itself on its bicultural identity, but Māori remain disproportionately affected by poverty, health disparities, incarceration, and unemployment—issues the Māori Party argues are tied directly to broken Treaty promises.
For many Māori, the protest was less about disrupting Parliament and more about asserting visibility in a system that still often treats them as outsiders.
What Happens Next
With the suspensions now enforced, the three MPs will be absent from key debates and votes. However, their party insists it will continue to fight for Māori rights and constitutional protections from outside the chamber.
“This won’t silence us,” Waititi said. “It only proves why we’re needed in there.”
Meanwhile, debate continues over how New Zealand’s Parliament can create a more inclusive framework—one that respects both procedural order and cultural expression. Calls are growing for new guidelines on protest and symbolic acts within the chamber, particularly those rooted in Indigenous identity.
Māori MPs Punished Māori MPs Punished
You must Register or Login to post a comment.