Obama on Trump Claims: ‘Bizarre, Ridiculous, Weak Attempt at Distraction’/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ Former President Trump baselessly accused Barack Obama and other officials of “treason” over the 2016 Russia probe. The remarks followed a report by DNI Tulsi Gabbard that questioned past conclusions about Russian interference. Obama’s office issued a rare rebuttal, labeling Trump’s claims as “ridiculous.”
Treason Allegations Against Obama – Quick Looks
- Trump accused Obama and others of treason over the Russia probe
- DNI Tulsi Gabbard released a controversial report downplaying 2016 Russian interference
- Obama’s office issued a rare response, calling the claims “outrageous”
- Trump’s accusations coincided with questions about the Jeffrey Epstein case
- Democrats criticized the report as politically motivated misinformation
- Previous bipartisan investigations confirmed Russia’s interference in the 2016 election
- The Trump administration is now targeting ex-intelligence officials for investigation
- Trump’s base is pressuring him to release more Epstein-related information
Deep Look
Trump’s Baseless Treason Accusations Stir Rare Response from Obama
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump reignited long-held grievances over the 2016 Russia investigation on Tuesday by launching explosive accusations of “treason” against former President Barack Obama and other senior officials. The claims, made during a meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in the Oval Office, lacked evidence but were amplified by a newly released intelligence report from Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard.
Trump’s comments are part of a larger pattern of using the federal government’s resources to scrutinize perceived enemies from the early days of his political ascent. As he targets individuals who were involved in the original Russia investigation, Trump also seeks to unify his political base—fractured in part due to renewed focus on the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.
Obama’s Office Fires Back
The former president’s office, which rarely comments on Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric, broke its silence. Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesperson for Obama, said, “These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.” The comment marked a rare moment of direct engagement, underlining the seriousness of the accusation.
Gabbard’s Russia Report Rekindles Debate
The spark for Trump’s tirade was a new report from DNI Tulsi Gabbard. Released the previous Friday, the document emphasized that Obama-era officials determined Russia had not hacked voting systems to change vote counts—something the Obama administration had never claimed occurred. However, it downplayed other forms of Russian interference, including the widely documented hacking and leaking of Democratic Party emails and the manipulation of public opinion via fake social media campaigns.
Gabbard’s findings were seen by critics as a strategic attempt to revise history, particularly as she appeared to win renewed favor from Trump. “She’s the hottest one in the room right now,” Trump said of Gabbard, further praising her while hinting more revelations were to come.
Democrats Push Back Hard
Prominent Democrats, including Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, criticized Gabbard’s report as misleading and politically driven.
“It is sadly not surprising that DNI Gabbard…is once again weaponizing her position to amplify the president’s election conspiracy theories,” Warner posted on X (formerly Twitter).
Rep. Jim Himes of the House Intelligence Committee reinforced that Russia’s election interference has been thoroughly examined and affirmed by bipartisan investigations.
“Every legitimate investigation…found no evidence of politicization and endorsed the findings” from the original 2017 intelligence assessment.
Ongoing Investigations Into Intelligence Officials
As part of the administration’s broader agenda, former CIA Director John Brennan and ex-FBI Director James Comey are reportedly under federal investigation. CIA Director John Ratcliffe recently referred Brennan to the Justice Department, fueling speculation about a renewed effort to discredit the initial Russia probe findings.
Trump has also targeted his 2016 rival Hillary Clinton and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, branding them as conspirators without presenting any concrete proof. Notably, the Supreme Court has ruled that former presidents, like Obama, are immune from prosecution for official acts—a legal shield that renders Trump’s accusations more political than prosecutorial.
Distraction from Epstein Case?
Trump’s dramatic pivot to accusations of treason came as he faced renewed scrutiny over the Epstein case. When asked about the Justice Department’s push to interview Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s convicted associate, Trump deflected.
“It’s sort of a witch hunt, a continuation of the witch hunt,” he said.
His remarks come amid pressure from conspiracy-leaning factions of his base, who are demanding transparency around Epstein’s client lists. Trump’s opponents argue he is resisting disclosure due to past ties with the disgraced financier, though Trump claims he severed the relationship long ago and denies any involvement in Epstein’s crimes.
Historical Context and Next Steps
The overall consensus among U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies remains firm: Russia did interfere in the 2016 election, and those findings are upheld by the Mueller report, House and Senate Intelligence Committee investigations, and independent probes. The Gabbard report stands out as a political anomaly meant to cast doubt on an already-settled narrative.
As Trump seeks to redirect political discourse with these claims, critics warn that the strategy risks further politicizing national intelligence and undermining public trust in democratic institutions. Whether the accusations yield legal consequences or fade as campaign rhetoric remains to be seen.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.