Pentagon Uses $130M Anonymous Trump Ally Donation to Pay Troops Amid Shutdown/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ The Pentagon confirmed it will use a $130 million donation from an anonymous ally of President Trump to cover military pay amid the ongoing government shutdown. The move, while unusual and legally questionable, was approved under the Department of Defense’s gift authority. Lawmakers and experts are demanding transparency, citing concerns over legality and potential foreign influence.
Pentagon Uses $130M Donation to Cover Military Pay — Quick Looks
- Pentagon to use $130M donation from anonymous Trump associate to pay troops.
- Defense officials cite “general gift acceptance authority” for accepting funds.
- Critics question legality under the Antideficiency Act.
- Lawmakers concerned over donor’s identity and potential foreign ties.
- Trump says donor “doesn’t want recognition,” calling them “a friend.”
- Funds unlikely to significantly impact military payroll (approx. $100 per service member).
- Democrats call for oversight, citing potential misuse of donation authority.
- Treasury, Pentagon, and White House give conflicting responses to donor questions.
Deep Look
Pentagon to Use $130 Million Trump-Linked Anonymous Donation to Fund Military Pay During Government Shutdown
In a highly unorthodox move that is drawing both praise and scrutiny, the Pentagon confirmed Friday it will tap into a $130 million donation from an anonymous supporter of President Donald Trump to help pay military service members during the ongoing government shutdown.
According to Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell, the sizable gift was made with the explicit condition that it be used to offset military salaries and benefits.
“The donation was made on the condition that it be used to offset the cost of Service members’ salaries and benefits,” Parnell said in a statement. The Department of Defense accepted the contribution under its “general gift acceptance authority.”
While private gifts to the military are not without precedent, using them to cover base salaries during a funding lapse is unprecedented. Typically, military pay is drawn exclusively from congressional appropriations—a cornerstone of federal budgeting and accountability.
A Donation That Raises More Questions Than It Answers
The donor’s identity has not been publicly disclosed, leading to immediate bipartisan concern about transparency, legality, and national security. President Trump, speaking Thursday, claimed the contribution came from “a friend of mine” and said the individual did not want recognition. He declined to offer further details.
When pressed by reporters on whether the donor has ties to foreign governments, companies, or political interests, the White House referred the question to the Pentagon, which then referred it back to the White House. Treasury officials did not respond to inquiries.
Democrats and Budget Experts Sound the Alarm
Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, the top Democrat on the Senate’s defense appropriations subcommittee, said the secrecy surrounding the donation poses potential national security risks.
“Using anonymous donations to fund our military raises troubling questions of whether our own troops are at risk of literally being bought and paid for by foreign powers,” Coons said in a public statement.
Coons and other lawmakers also pointed to the limited scope of the Pentagon’s gift acceptance authority. Under federal law, the Department of Defense is allowed to accept private funds for specific uses—such as constructing military hospitals, funding schools, maintaining cemeteries, or helping wounded veterans and their families. Covering regular salaries is not typically permitted.
Does the Move Violate the Antideficiency Act?
Budget experts, including Bill Hoagland, a former GOP Senate budget advisor now at the Bipartisan Policy Center, argue the Pentagon’s use of the donation likely violates the Antideficiency Act—a key federal law that prohibits government agencies from spending money that has not been appropriated by Congress.
“The Antideficiency Act is explicit that private donations cannot be used to offset a lapse in appropriations,” Hoagland told CNN. “I think they could accept it, but they could not use it for that purpose because the law is very clear.”
The Trump administration has already faced accusations of breaching this law multiple times throughout the shutdown. Critics say similar legal oversteps were made when federal workers were dismissed without pay or when certain services were maintained without allocated funds.
Impact of the $130 Million Donation: Symbolic More Than Substantial
While the $130 million donation is striking in size, it offers only a modest reprieve to the nearly 1.3 million active-duty U.S. military personnel. Divided evenly, the amount works out to just over $100 per service member. Still, the symbolic implications are far more significant than the financial ones.
The move signals a shift toward private donors stepping into roles traditionally reserved for the government—raising red flags about precedent, accountability, and the potential for undue influence.
Trump’s Role and the Broader Political Context
President Trump has openly embraced the donation, portraying it as a patriotic gesture made necessary by what he describes as Democratic obstruction in Congress. Trump continues to campaign aggressively on themes of loyalty to the military and has turned the shutdown into a platform for attacking what he calls “government failure.”
At the same time, he has sparked controversy by demolishing parts of the White House East Wing to construct a $250 million ballroom funded by private donors—many of whom are connected to defense contractors and tech giants. The optics of funding construction at the executive residence while the government is shuttered have added fuel to criticism from across the political spectrum.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.