RFK Jr.’s Health Report Faces Citation Scrutiny \ Newslooks \ Washington DC \ Mary Sidiqi \ Evening Edition \ The White House has pledged to revise RFK Jr.’s “Make America Healthy Again” report after inaccuracies in cited studies were uncovered. Despite the citation issues, officials defend the report’s broader message on chronic health issues. The corrected report will help guide future public health policy proposals.
Quick Looks
- White House confirms MAHA report will be corrected for citation errors.
- At least seven referenced studies could not be verified by investigators.
- Report highlights chronic disease, prescription use, and children’s health.
- Critics question lack of transparency around authorship.
- HHS spokesperson defends report as “historic and transformative.”
- Kennedy calls for reform of food systems, vaccines, and chemical use.
- Misinterpreted studies involved screen time, anxiety, and medications.
- Trump-aligned farmers voice concerns over pesticide criticisms.
- The report supports a $500M health initiative request to Congress.
- Updated policy recommendations expected later this year.
Deep Look
White House to Correct RFK Jr.’s Health Report Following Citation Concerns
The White House confirmed Thursday that it will revise a major federal health report led by U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. following revelations of citation errors and unverifiable studies. Titled Make America Healthy Again (MAHA), the 72-page report has been heralded by the administration as a groundbreaking initiative to tackle chronic illness in children, revamp food and pharmaceutical regulation, and restore public trust in health institutions.
However, an investigation by news outlet NOTUS raised serious questions about the integrity of the report’s supporting research. At least seven studies cited in the document could not be located, and one academic explicitly denied ever authoring the work attributed to her. The inaccurate references centered on sensitive topics such as childhood anxiety, screen time, and prescription medication use.
White House Responds to Growing Criticism
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed the controversy during a media briefing, saying the administration would revise the MAHA report to correct formatting and citation problems.
“I understand there was some formatting issues with the MAHA report that are being addressed and the report will be updated,” Leavitt told reporters. “But it does not negate the substance of the report, which, as you know, is one of the most transformative health reports that has ever been released by the federal government.”
Leavitt also reaffirmed the administration’s full support of Secretary Kennedy, stating that President Trump’s administration maintains “complete confidence” in his leadership and vision.
The Health and Human Services Department echoed this sentiment. “Minor citation and formatting errors have been corrected,” said HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon. He called the report a “historic and transformative assessment” meant to better understand what he described as a chronic disease epidemic among American children.
Citation Issues Undermine Transparency Promise
The citation issues have dealt an early blow to Kennedy’s promise of “radical transparency” and “gold-standard” science in government health policy. Despite Kennedy’s insistence on rigorous standards, his team has declined to name the authors or contributors behind the MAHA report, prompting further questions about its development.
Among the more troubling revelations in the NOTUS report was that some cited studies simply didn’t exist. One academic, who was named as a source for a study on childhood anxiety, told NOTUS that while she has conducted related research, she never wrote or published the study listed in the report.
Other citations were found to have distorted the findings of real research, particularly in areas relating to children’s mental health and screen time use. These misinterpretations have led to renewed criticism of Kennedy’s approach, especially among professionals in the public health and pediatric research communities.
Political Repercussions and Farmer Backlash
Beyond academic scrutiny, the MAHA report has sparked controversy among President Trump’s base—particularly among farmers who felt targeted by the report’s harsh stance on pesticides and agricultural chemicals. Several industry groups and GOP lawmakers have pushed back on claims that America’s food supply is inherently toxic, framing the report as alarmist and disconnected from farm realities.
“This isn’t just a question of science,” said one agricultural lobbyist. “It’s a political landmine. Accusing farmers of poisoning children is not the way to earn bipartisan support.”
Kennedy’s report advocates for major reforms in how the government regulates food additives, environmental toxins, and pharmaceuticals, including calls to revisit the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule—a long-controversial topic that has drawn both support and backlash.
Funding, Policy, and What Comes Next
The MAHA report is intended to serve as the foundation for a broader legislative and policy initiative. The White House has already requested a $500 million funding boost from Congress to support Kennedy’s agenda, which includes enhanced nutritional research, alternative medicine studies, and new oversight bodies focused on chronic disease prevention.
Despite the current controversy, Kennedy’s allies argue the report brings overdue attention to worsening health trends in children and young adults—rising obesity, anxiety, ADHD diagnoses, and reliance on prescription medication.
The administration has said a revised version of the report will be released in the coming weeks, ahead of formal policy recommendations expected by the end of the year.
Still, for many public health experts and business leaders, the damage may already be done.
“A report this significant must meet the highest standards of accuracy and transparency,” said a former NIH official. “This was a chance to build trust—and it got squandered by sloppy sourcing and politics.”
While Kennedy continues to enjoy strong support from the White House, the citation scandal has become a major test for his brand of outsider health reform—and for the administration’s push to reshape America’s public health infrastructure.
RFK Jr.’s Health
You must Register or Login to post a comment.