Trump Pressures Zelenskyy to Accept Peace Deal: ‘You Don’t Have the Cards’/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ President Donald Trump’s 28-point peace plan forces Ukraine into a political and strategic bind. The proposal demands major concessions from Ukraine, including territorial loss and NATO neutrality. With battlefield fatigue and internal scandals, President Zelenskyy faces intense pressure and limited options.
Trump Ukraine Peace Plan Pressure Quick Looks
- Peace Plan Demands: Concede Donbas, cut army size, forgo NATO membership
- Zelenskyy Cornered: Corruption scandal and battlefield losses weaken his hand
- U.S. Pressure Mounts: Trump sets deadline, warns Zelenskyy “doesn’t have the cards”
- Cultural Concessions: Plan supports Putin’s historical narrative, rejects “Nazi ideology”
- Military Impact: Ukraine struggles with energy attacks and weakened war capacity
- Global Implications: European support and future funding now uncertain
Trump Pressures Zelenskyy to Accept Peace Deal: ‘You Don’t Have the Cards’
Deep Look
With the unveiling of a sweeping 28-point peace proposal, U.S. President Donald Trump has reignited global debate about Ukraine’s future. His administration’s plan, revealed without prior warning to Ukraine, has pushed President Volodymyr Zelenskyy into a political corner. The proposal, which favors numerous Russian demands, would require Ukraine to make drastic concessions on territory, security, and sovereignty.
Trump, who has long expressed skepticism about America’s support for Ukraine, told reporters that the plan presents “a way of getting peace” and that Zelenskyy must approve it. Trump’s blunt ultimatum—backed by battlefield fatigue, internal political troubles in Kyiv, and a shifting global political landscape—has forced Zelenskyy to grapple with one of the most difficult moments of his presidency.
A Strained Relationship Resurfaces
The Trump-Zelenskyy dynamic has been troubled since their first phone call in 2019, when Trump allegedly pressured the newly elected Ukrainian leader to investigate Joe Biden—an act that triggered Trump’s first impeachment. Since then, the relationship has remained rocky.
Zelenskyy hasn’t yet spoken to Trump about the new plan, but a conversation is expected soon. Their most recent meeting earlier this year in the Oval Office ended in confrontation. Trump and Vice President JD Vance reportedly scolded Zelenskyy for not showing enough gratitude for the $180 billion in U.S. assistance sent since the war began. The clash resulted in a temporary freeze in American aid.
Trump has framed the new plan as a realistic path to peace, but it demands heavy sacrifices. Key among them: Ukraine must give up its eastern Donbas region—a strategically and economically vital area—despite large portions of it still being under Ukrainian control. Military analysts suggest it would take Russia years to fully occupy the territory. Still, Trump has dismissed Ukraine’s control as unsustainable, saying they are “losing land.”
Formal Presentation and Ukrainian Response
The plan was formally presented in Kyiv by U.S. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll. The trip came as a surprise to even his own staff. Army officials sensed that Ukrainian leaders saw the plan as an initial negotiation step, not a final agreement.
Despite this interpretation, the urgency in Trump’s rhetoric suggests little room for debate.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt declared the plan a “win-win scenario,” arguing that it reflects the current “realities on the ground.”
Trump, recalling his February Oval Office exchange with Zelenskyy, reiterated his position: “You don’t have the cards.”
Zelenskyy’s Growing Vulnerability
Zelenskyy’s capacity to resist U.S. pressure is further weakened by a corruption scandal involving $100 million in kickbacks related to Ukraine’s nuclear energy company. The scandal triggered high-level resignations and placed Zelenskyy’s administration under scrutiny.
University of Chicago political economist Konstantin Sonin said the Trump team likely sees Ukraine’s weakened position as leverage.
“Zelenskyy’s back is against the wall,” Sonin noted. He warned that accepting Trump’s terms could even collapse the Ukrainian government.
Adding to the strain, Ukraine is once again facing Russian attacks on critical infrastructure. The ongoing aerial bombardments have led to power outages and further demoralized a population entering another harsh winter.
Meanwhile, European plans to finance Ukraine’s 2026 budget with loans tied to frozen Russian assets have begun to falter, potentially threatening another pillar of Ukraine’s support structure.
Culture, Identity, and National Pride
The Trump plan also includes a clause demanding the abolition of discriminatory measures in media and education while condemning “all Nazi ideology.” This language closely mirrors Kremlin narratives and could be interpreted as legitimizing Vladimir Putin’s claim that the war is a campaign to “denazify” Ukraine—a claim widely debunked and dismissed by Western governments.
In Ukraine’s 2019 parliamentary elections, far-right groups garnered only 2% of the vote, a figure far lower than in several EU countries. However, by including such language, Trump’s proposal echoes Putin’s justifications and could strike a blow to Ukrainian national identity.
David Silbey, a military historian at Cornell University, emphasized how symbolic losses are just as critical as territorial ones. “From territory loss to cultural concessions, I just don’t think Zelenskyy could do this deal and look his public in the eye again,” Silbey said.
Elections and Future Power
Another element of the plan calls for new national elections within 100 days of the deal’s signing. This provision raises questions about Ukraine’s ability to conduct a fair, stable vote during wartime and under occupation in parts of the country.
Analysts believe this clause could be an attempt to introduce regime change through democratic means, capitalizing on Zelenskyy’s currently weakened position.
Final Thoughts
Trump’s peace plan is bold, controversial, and deeply polarizing. While it’s presented as a diplomatic breakthrough, it asks Ukraine to abandon several of its red lines—territorial integrity, future NATO membership, legal accountability for Russia, and national identity.
For Zelenskyy, navigating this proposal will require balancing between international pressure and domestic survival. Accepting the plan as is could alienate his base and the Ukrainian public, while rejecting it risks straining relations with a powerful, if unpredictable, ally.
You must Register or Login to post a comment.