Top StoryUS

Trump’s Solo Strike on Iran Deepens Congressional Divide

Trump’s Solo Strike on Iran Deepens Congressional Divide/ Newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ President Trump ordered a surprise military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities without full consultation with Congress, alerting only top GOP leaders and leaving Democrats largely in the dark. Legislative battles are already brewing: Democrats are pushing war‑powers resolutions requiring congressional approval, while Trump locks in support from Republican leadership. The decision threatens to fracture the MAGA movement, as isolationists and interventionists within the party clash over Trump’s evolving foreign‑policy approach.

President Donald Trump arrives with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to speak from the East Room of the White House in Washington, Saturday, June 21, 2025, after the U.S. military struck three Iranian nuclear and military sites, directly joining Israel’s effort to decapitate the country’s nuclear program. (Carlos Barria/Pool via AP)


Quick Look

  • Pre‑strike briefings: Top Republicans (Johnson, Thune, Cotton) were informed; Democrats Schumer and Jeffries received limited pre‑ or post‑briefings.
  • Congressional action: Resolutions opposition introduced by Sens. Kaine, Massie, Khanna, Ocasio‑Cortez seek to restrict future U.S. military activity in Iran.
  • Party rift: Liberty‑leaning Republicans (Massie, Paul) oppose campaign‑style foreign interventions, while GOP leaders publicly support Trump.
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., and the Republican leadership depart a news conference after defending President Donald Trump’s handling of protests in Los Angeles by sending thousands of National Guard troops and 700 active duty Marines to quell the immigration protests, at the RNC near the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Trump’s Solo Strike on Iran Deepens Congressional Divide

Deep Look

President Trump’s unilateral strike on Iran’s nuclear sites has ignited fresh political turmoil in Washington, exposing deep partisan and ideological fissures in Congress. Executed without full congressional sign-off, the mission relied on briefings given primarily to Republicans—House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate GOP leader John Thune, Senator Tom Cotton, and others—while Democrats only received minimal notifications. Johnson was notified only after the operation began, and top Intelligence Committee Democrats were left to learn of the strike via social media, triggering sharp criticism.

Sen. Tim Kaine has advanced a war‑powers resolution aimed at forcing Trump to withdraw forces unless Congress explicitly authorizes any further combat in Iran. In the House, Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie—despite stark partisan differences—have co-sponsored related legislation, signaling a rare cross‑aisle alliance rooted in shared concerns about unreviewed military action. Meanwhile, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez has even suggested Trump’s move could warrant impeachment.

Trump’s base is fracturing. While GOP leadership fast‑tracked praise for his decision, isolationist conservatives like Massie and Rand Paul who supported Trump’s “America First” platform now find themselves at odds with his more aggressive approach.

“I think I represent part of the coalition that elected Trump,” said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., on CBS. “We were tired of endless wars in the Middle East.”

Massie remarked to Face the Nation, “We were tired of endless wars in the Middle East.”

One, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he learned of the strikes on social media, which he said “is an uncomfortable thing for the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee.”

“Bad enough that we weren’t informed,” Himes, of Connecticut, said Sunday on CNN, “but unconstitutional that we didn’t have the opportunity to debate and speak, as the representatives of the people, on what is one of the more consequential foreign policy things that this country has done in a long time.”

Balancing war and diplomacy, the administration has argued the strike was narrowly focused on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, not a declaration of war.

Vice President Vance stated that “we’re not at war with Iran. We’re at war with Iran’s nuclear program.”

However, Trump’s reaction to his critics within the party has been harsh. Labeling Massie “a pathetic LOSER,” he pledged to endorse a primary challenger aligned with stronger interventionist policies.

Despite asserting constitutional military authority as Commander‑in‑Chief, the Trump administration may be setting a precedent for future unilateral military action. That trajectory risks politicizing national security and compromising congressional oversight—a tool used historically to legitimize wartime efforts, such as post‑9/11 authorizations.


More on US News

Previous Article
Global Concern Mounts as U.S. Joins Israel’s War on Iran
Next Article
Wall Street on Edge, Oil Prices Wobble; Investors Eye Iran’s Response

How useful was this article?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this article.

Latest News

Menu