Trump’s Venezuela Action Pressures GOP Unity in 2026/ newslooks/ WASHINGTON/ J. Mansour/ Morning Edition/ Trump’s military intervention in Venezuela is straining unity within the Republican Party in a pivotal election year. Some conservatives warn that his plan to “run” Venezuela undermines his America First platform. While GOP dissent remains muted, tensions could grow as political and humanitarian risks rise.
Trump’s Venezuela Gamble – Quick Looks
- Trump’s Venezuela strike sparks internal GOP tensions in 2026
- Some Republicans uneasy with U.S. role in governing Venezuela
- Critics say Trump’s plan contradicts “America First” doctrine
- Marjorie Taylor Greene and moderates voice rare pushback
- Trump defends move as protecting U.S. security and interests
- Rubio, Cotton frame action as unlike Iraq or Afghanistan
- GOP base largely supportive, but risks may build over time
- Democrats slam strike as unconstitutional and politically motivated
Deep Look
Trump’s Venezuela Intervention Sparks GOP Unease Amid High-Stakes Election Year
President Donald Trump’s decision to launch a military intervention in Venezuela, culminating in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, is creating new friction inside the Republican Party as the U.S. heads into a fiercely contested election year. The move, while hailed by some GOP figures as a show of strength, is also drawing criticism from both far-right and moderate Republicans who fear it undercuts the core of Trump’s “America First” foreign policy doctrine.
The mission to detain Maduro and transport him to New York for prosecution on drug trafficking and narco-terrorism charges was one of the boldest foreign operations of Trump’s presidency. However, Trump’s declaration that the U.S. will “run” Venezuela during its transition away from Maduro’s rule has touched a nerve.
Cracks in GOP Unity
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), once a vocal Trump ally, denounced the action as a betrayal of populist ideals. “This is the same Washington playbook we’re tired of — it serves big corporations, oil executives, not the American people,” Greene said on NBC’s Meet the Press, adding that she will resign from Congress on Monday.
That criticism was echoed by more moderate Republicans like Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), who stated, “The only country the United States should be running is the United States.” Fitzpatrick, considered one of the most vulnerable Republicans in 2026, reflects a wider anxiety within the party over Trump’s expansive use of executive power abroad.
While Trump’s grip on the GOP remains formidable, recent months have seen an uptick in intra-party dissent. Republican lawmakers have pressed him on issues like the release of the Epstein files and the rising cost of living, issues that threaten to overshadow foreign policy triumphs as voters head to the polls.
Foreign Policy vs. Domestic Focus
Trump’s renewed interventionist posture also contradicts the anti-war, anti-globalist rhetoric that fueled his 2016 campaign. Back then, Trump harshly criticized the Iraq War as a “big, fat mistake” and promised to prioritize domestic issues.
But now, he is openly embracing U.S. military dominance in the Western Hemisphere.
On Saturday, he said he is “not afraid of boots on the ground” in Venezuela if necessary. On Sunday, aboard Air Force One, Trump doubled down: “They said this is what we voted for… They’re thrilled.”
Trump insists the mission safeguards U.S. security, but the potential risks are mounting. An extended military presence could destabilize the region, escalate the refugee crisis, and expose American troops to danger. There are also open questions about how quickly the U.S. can tap Venezuela’s oil to fulfill Trump’s promises of economic benefit.
The president’s rhetoric on Venezuela’s oil industry echoes his old critique of Iraq, when he argued in a 2013 CPAC speech that the U.S. should have “taken the oil” to pay for the war.
Allies Offer Comparisons — and Caution
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Senate Intelligence Chair Tom Cotton have sought to draw historical parallels that make the operation more palatable to conservatives. Rubio emphasized that “Venezuela looks nothing like Iraq, Libya, or Afghanistan”, arguing that the country poses a unique threat due to the presence of Iranian agents.
Cotton pointed to the 1989 U.S. invasion of Panama and the arrest of Manuel Noriega as a more appropriate comparison. “That was a successful operation. I believe, in the long run, this will be too,” he said on CNN’s State of the Union.
Still, in response to concerns about U.S. overreach, Rubio clarified that the administration will not govern Venezuela’s daily affairs, beyond enforcing the ongoing “oil quarantine.”
Muted GOP Resistance — for Now
Despite some discomfort, there’s no organized Republican opposition to Trump’s Venezuela policy — at least not yet. Most GOP lawmakers are withholding criticism or offering only light warnings.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), facing a tough reelection fight, said Maduro should stand trial, but emphasized that Congress should have been briefed sooner and must be involved moving forward.
Even Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a frequent critic of military action, stopped short of condemning Trump. He wrote, “Time will tell if regime change in Venezuela is successful without significant monetary or human cost.”
For now, Republicans are walking a delicate line: wary of Trump’s shift from non-interventionism to military assertiveness, but unwilling to oppose a popular figure in an election year. The true test may come if the Venezuela operation grows into a prolonged crisis.
Democratic Pushback and Fundraising Firestorm
Meanwhile, Democrats have denounced the mission as unconstitutional, slamming Trump for engaging in unauthorized foreign conflict during an election year.
The Democratic National Committee moved quickly to fundraise off the news, branding the move “another illegal war from Trump.”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) accused the administration of using Venezuela as a distraction from domestic failures, including the Epstein controversy and skyrocketing health care costs.
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg described the strike as part of a familiar playbook: “An unpopular president — failing on the economy and losing his grip at home — decides to launch a war for regime change abroad.”
You must Register or Login to post a comment.